Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 13 Dec 2001

Vol. 546 No. 5

Ceisteanna–Questions. Priority Questions. - Garda Compensation Scheme.

Alan Shatter

Question:

3 Mr. Shatter asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of cases for Garda Síochána compensation awaiting determination in the courts; the number of gardaí who have made such claims; the year in which outstanding claims were first made; his views on whether the delay in processing such claims is acceptable; and the reforms he proposes to introduce to ensure such claims are processed and adjudicated upon within a reasonable period of time. [32184/01]

The Garda Síochána (Compensation) Acts, 1941 and 1945, provide for a scheme of compensation for members of the Garda Síochána who are maliciously injured in the course of their duty or in relation to the performance of their duties as members of the Garda Síochána and to the dependants of members who have died from injuries maliciously inflicted on them. Under section 6 of the 1941 Act, a member of the Garda Síochána who has been maliciously injured may sue the State only by an authorisation issued by the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

Before deciding if an applicant should be authorised to apply to the High Court for compensation in respect of the injury, the practice has been for the Minister to consider all medical reports submitted by the applicant together with a report on the incident by the Garda Commissioner and a report on the injury by the chief medical officer of the Garda Síochána. Members are referred to the Garda chief medical officer as soon as a final medical report has been submitted by their solicitors.

There are approximately 1,200 applications for compensation being processed under the Acts at present. Approximately 600 of these claims are at an early stage of processing in that various reports have yet to be furnished. The status of the remaining claims are: approximately 180 cases where the member has been examined by the Garda chief medical officer and the commissioner is preparing a report for submission to the Department; approximately 304 cases for which final medical reports have been received and for which applicants are awaiting examination by the Garda chief medical officer; approximately 120 cases for which the commissioner's reports, including the Garda chief medical officer's report have been provided and for which a ministerial decision as to the granting of an authorisation is required and 14 cases for which authorisations have recently issued to the applicant's solicitors. I have been advised by the Chief State Solicitor's Office that there are approximately 145 cases with them awaiting a High Court hearing.

Since 1955, when the current system was introduced, more than 6,000 Garda compensation files have been opened in relation to the Acts. Unfortunately, records do not exist on claims made prior to 1955. The information sought as regards the year in which outstanding claims were made is not readily available and cannot be ascertained within the timeframe for answering this question.

A backlog of claims occurred a number of years ago due initially to two judicial review cases which changed the manner in which claims are processed and then because of the death of a Garda surgeon and the delay in replacing him with the Garda chief medical officer. The Garda chief medical officer is currently addressing the elimination of the backlog. To assist this process, sanction has been sought from the Department of Finance for additional medical assistance for the Garda chief medical officer.

The operation of the compensation scheme under the Acts was last reviewed in 1997. That review resulted in a recommendation on the establishment of a compensation tribunal to deal with the less serious injuries. The Garda associations, although represented on the committee, have sought to have certain of the committee's recommendations amended. My officials will be meeting with representatives of the associations in the new year after which I propose to bring proposals to Government for consideration.

Unfortunately, unavoidable delays can occur where necessary additional inquiries are required because of the seriousness of the injuries received and the circumstances of the incident. I agree that delays in processing applications for compensation should be avoided where possible and I have requested my officials to review the processes used with a view to streamlining and elimination of delays where possible.

Does the Minister accept that where a member of the Garda Síochána suffers serious injury or families suffer a bereavement as a result of a Garda suffering a fatality, there is a duty on the State to ensure compensation claims made properly by members of the Garda Síochána are processed with some reasonable degree of speed? Will he accept the current system is not working and that the delays in processing compensation claims are outrageous and indefensible? Will he acknowledge that during his term in office, he has taken no meaningful steps to address this issue? Will he indicate why there are no readily available statistics and information in his Department which would facilitate him in advising the House of the number of years for which different claims await to be addressed?

Of the 600 claims at an early stage, will the Minister indicate how many of those 600 were filed by the end of last year? In relation to the remaining 600 cases and the breakdown the Minister has given the House, will he indicate how many of those claims back date two, three, four and five years? What new arrangements does the Minister intend to put in place, if any, to allow the enormous backlog of claims which have accumulated to be properly processed through his Department and by the Garda Síochána? Does the Minister agree that, even in the context of the 145 cases apparently awaiting hearing in the High Court, they could be waiting two to three years before being disposed of, based on the speed currently applicable to processing these claims?

I have indicated to the Deputy that I am not satisfied with the manner in which these claims are being dealt with from a time perspective. I have also stated that there was a report which was furnished back in 1997 and which made various recommendations. Those recommendations included the setting up of a Garda Síochána Personal Injuries Compensation Tribunal which would operate along the same lines as the Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal, the difference being that gardaí would be compensated for pain and suffering.

Discussions with the Garda Representative Association and the Association of Garda Sergeants and Inspectors will take place in the new year to try to reach agreement on the matter. Every effort will be made to try to reach agreement because I realise how important this can be. It is true that we had difficulty recruiting additional assistance. However, I can happily say that the Garda authorities have identified a doctor who is willing to assist the chief medical officer in processing the compensation cases. The schedule of fees is a difficulty. The doctor in question has indicated that he is prepared to consider a fee of a certain amount. That proposal has to be considered by the Department of Finance. There is, however, a long gap between what the doctor seeks and what the Irish Society of Occupational Medicine has on its books as a fee for an hourly session.

Does the Minister agree it is not sufficient to acknowledge in this House the fact that members of the Garda Síochána put their lives at risk daily to protect the community and that this House and the Government, in particular, have an obligation to ensure that where a member of the Garda Síochána suffers injury as a consequence of the duties they undertake and where compensation is properly payable, compensation should be paid in a reasonable period?

Does the Minister agree that the system, as it now applies, is not operating in an efficient manner? It is a major scandal that members of the Garda Síochána may have to wait years to receive compensation in circumstances in which it is proper that it be paid. Will the Minister ensure the information I have requested in my question, which his Department clearly does not have available to it because it has given no priority or shown no real concern in respect of this issue, and which the Minister says he does not have to hand, is furnished to me and other Members of the House immediately prior to or after the Christmas recess?

Firstly, I have explained that there are 1,200 applications being processed.

I asked the Minister about timeframes, but he cannot give that information.

I have explained that 600 of these are at a very early stage and I have set out the position in respect of all the other claims. Let us be clear that the State does compensate the Garda Síochána. To give the Deputy an idea of the state of play in that respect, in 1991 there were 291 applications, with 250 awards costing £3.707 million; in 1992, there were 372 applications, with 293 awards costing £4.471 million; in 1993, there were 327 applications, with 151 awards costing £2.45 million; in 1994, there were 287 applications, with 167 awards costing £3.482 million; in 1995, there were 332 applications, with 240 awards and total compensation of £3.533 million; in 1996, there were 227 applications, with 150 awards costing £2.523 million; in 1997, there were 266 applications, with 50 awards costing £1.388 million; in 1998, there were 299 applications, with 154 awards costing £4.188 million; in 1999, there were 333 applications, with 264 awards costing £7.616 million; in 2000, there were 369 applications, with 170 awards costing £6,922,229; and in 2001, there were 215 applications, with 214 awards costing £8,948,983.

Top
Share