Tuesday, 15 Oct 2019

Written Answers Nos. 102-126

Legislative Measures

Ceisteanna (102, 103)

Shane Cassells

Ceist:

102. Deputy Shane Cassells asked the Taoiseach the number, date of publication and details of post-enactment reports published by his Department since March 2011, in tabular form. [41590/19]

Shane Cassells

Ceist:

103. Deputy Shane Cassells asked the Taoiseach the number of Acts passed since March 2011 that his Department is responsible for; and the date each Act was signed into law. [41591/19]

Freagraí scríofa

The Taoiseach

I propose to take Questions Nos. 102 and 103 together.

No legislation has been passed by my Department since March 2011.

Departmental Staff Data

Ceisteanna (104)

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

104. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Taoiseach the number of full-time and part-time civil servants his Department has recruited by grade in each of the years 2014 to 2018 and to date in 2019; and the number of full-time and part-time civil servants his Department has lost due to retirement by grade in the same period. [41825/19]

Freagraí scríofa

The Taoiseach

The information requested by the Deputy regarding to the number of recruitments and retirements from 2014 to date, is set out in the following tables.

My Department uses workforce planning and succession planning to ensure that there are sufficient staffing resources in place to deliver the Department's strategic goals. In the main, staff are recruited to my Department through the Public Appointments Service (PAS) by way of competition.

Vacancies are also filled by way of mobility through the Civil Service Mobility Scheme, internal promotions and secondments from other Government Departments and the public service, which are not reflected in the tables.

Table 1 - Recruitment

Grade	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	to date 2019
Secretary General	0	0	0	0	0	0
Second Secretary General	0	0	0	0	0	0
Assistant Secretary	0	0	0	1	0	1
Principal Officer	0	0	0	0	1	0
Assistant Principal Officer	0	0	1	4	2	2
Higher Executive Officer	0	0	0	0	3	1
Admin. Officer	3	5	3	5	1	4
Executive Officer	0	3	0	3	2	2
Clerical Officer	0	9	6	15	7	10
Services Staff & Cleaners	2	1	2	2	0	0

*Table excludes politically appointed staff.

** Staff numbers reflect headcount rather than whole time equivalent.

Table 2 - Retirements

Grade	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	to date 2019
Secretary General	0	0	0	0	0	0
Second Secretary General	0	0	0	0	0	0
Assistant Secretary	0	0	0	0	1	0
Principal Officer	1	0	0	0	0	1
Assistant Principal Officer	1	0	0	0	3	0
Higher Executive Officer	0	0	0	0	1	0
Admin. Officer	0	0	0	0	0	0
Executive Officer	0	0	1	0	0	0
Clerical Officer	1	1	0	0	1	0
Services Staff & Cleaners	0	0	0	1	0	1

*Table excludes politically appointed staff.

** Staff numbers reflect headcount rather than whole time equivalent.

Defence Forces Recruitment

Ceisteanna (105)

Peter Burke

Ceist:

105. Deputy Peter Burke asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the status of an application by a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41653/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Minister of State at the Department of Defence

The application process for entry into the Defence Forces involves a number of stages, some of which have been outlined in the details supplied to the question.

Applicants are only contacted in relation to induction when the entire process is complete and in the case of the individual on whose behalf the enquiry has been made, this process is still ongoing.

Departmental Staff Data

Ceisteanna (106)

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

106. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of full-time and part-time civil servants his Department has recruited by grade in each of the years 2014 to 2018 and to date in 2019; the number of full-time and part-time civil servants his Department has lost due to retirement by grade in the same period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41815/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Minister of State at the Department of Defence

My Department recruits staff for full-time positions. However, a range of reduced attendance schemes, which are available to established civil servants, are availed of members of the staff of my Department. Therefore, some of those retiring will be working a reduced attendance pattern and are shown as part-time in the second table at the link. The first table shows the staff recruited in my Department and the second table shows the number of full-time and part-time staff who retired from my Department from 2014 until 9 October 2019.

Department Staff Tables

Air Corps Equipment

Ceisteanna (107)

Willie O'Dea

Ceist:

107. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if funding will be made available for the replacement of Cessna FR 172H aircraft in the Air Corps; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41832/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Minister of State at the Department of Defence

My priority as Minister with Responsibility for Defence is to ensure that the operational capability of the Defence Forces is maintained to the greatest extent possible so as to enable the Defence Forces to carry out their roles as assigned by Government.

The White Paper on Defence provides for the replacement of the current Air Corps Cessna fleet with three larger aircraft which will be equipped for Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR). Following an open tender competition, a contract was placed with Pilatus Aircraft Ltd in December 2017 at a cost of some €32m for the provision of three PC-12 fixed wing utility aircraft suitably equipped for ISTAR tasks which will replace the Cessna FR 172H fleet. The contract is well underway and it is expected that the three aircraft will be delivered in 2020.

The Deputy may wish to note that the White Paper  also provides for the replacement of the two CASA 235 Maritime Patrol Aircraft with consideration of their replacement with larger more capable aircraft, which would enhance maritime surveillance and provide a greater degree of utility for transport and cargo carrying tasks. A public tender competition for the replacement of the CASA Maritime Patrol Aircraft has recently been completed in my Department and a preferred bidder has been identified.

In accordance with the National Development Plan, the capital allocation for Defence has been increased to €113 million for 2020, an increase of €7 million on the 2019 allocation. The NDP provides for a total of €541 million over the period 2018 to 2022. This level of capital funding will allow the Defence Organisation to continue the programme of sustained equipment replacement and infrastructural development across the Army, Air Corps and Naval Service as identified and prioritised in the Defence White Paper and builds on the significant investment programme over recent years. The replacement of the Air Corps Cessna aircraft and the CASA 235 Maritime Patrol Aircraft are among the projects included for funding.

Departmental Properties

Ceisteanna (108)

Fiona O'Loughlin

Ceist:

108. Deputy Fiona O'Loughlin asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the work ongoing to identify suitable locations for car parking spaces on the Curragh; his plans to address antisocial behaviour on the land; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41862/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Minister of State at the Department of Defence

As the Deputy may be aware, as Minister for Defence, pursuant to the provisions of the Curragh of Kildare Act 1961, I am the custodian and guardian of the Curragh Plains.  I believe it is important to bear in mind, as recognised in the aforementioned Act, that the Curragh Plains is a working environment as well as being a place of historical, environmental and cultural importance. Sheep grazing and horse racing are centuries-old practices on Curragh lands and in addition the entire Plains are a working facility for the Defence Forces. As a place of work for those named groups and a high value amenity in terms of ecological and historical importance, I am very aware of the requirement to balance the needs of all parties when it comes to the ongoing management of the Curragh Plains.

As the Deputy is aware, there has been an increase in the team of Lands Staff employed by my Department to assist with the management of the Curragh Plains.  This increase has provided a greater presence on the ground to monitor the users of the Plains, I am advised that the Lands Staff have a good working relationship with An Garda Siochána who are called upon to deal with incidences of antisocial behaviour.  The Deputy may wish to note that a recent competitive tendering process was concluded by my Department.  As a result a new environmental management contract was recently entered into and the Lands Staff will be engaged directly with the contractors in relation to the operation of this contract.  In relation to future infrastructure provision and services, my Department continues to engage regularly with Kildare County Council on many and various local issues in relation to the Plains including the future management of the Curragh Plains.

Civil Defence

Ceisteanna (109)

Jack Chambers

Ceist:

109. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if Civil Defence uniforms were collected by his Department in 2017; the locations in which they were collected; the locations where they were stored; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42019/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Minister of State at the Department of Defence

I can confirm to the Deputy that discontinued Civil Defence uniforms were collected by my Department in 2017 and delivered to Civil Defence Headquarters in Roscrea, Co Tipperary.

 The uniforms were collected with the view to using them for charitable purposes.

 The items were placed into a container which was provided by a registered charity. The loaded container left Civil Defence Headquarters in late 2017.

 My officials have been subsequently informed that the items were not delivered as planned and this matter is currently being examined.

Defence Forces Data

Ceisteanna (110)

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

110. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the full list of capital projects valued at over €2 million in the Defence Forces that are ongoing at present; and when each capital project will be completed. [42336/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Minister of State at the Department of Defence

Under the National Development Plan, as part of Project Ireland 2040, the Defence Vote was allocated €541 million in capital funding for the period 2018 to 2022. This level of capital funding allows the Defence Organisation to undertake a programme of sustained equipment replacement and infrastructure development across the Army, Air Corps and Naval Service and demonstrates the Government’s commitment to ensuring that the Defence Forces have the capabilities necessary to deliver on all their assigned roles, both at home and overseas.

The following table sets out the full list of Defence capital projects, valued at over €2 million, that are ongoing at present and their anticipated completion date.

Programme/Project	Programme/Project Value	Anticipated Completion Date
Armoured Personnel Carrier Mid-Life Upgrade and Maintenance Programme	€68.0m	2022
Air Corps Fixed Wing Utility Aircraft Project	€43.1m	2020
Defence Forces 4x4 Vehicle Replacement Programme	€17.4m	2022
Storage Facilities at Defence Forces Training Centre, Curragh Camp	€13.5m	2019
Virtual Desktop Architecture IT Project	€12.8m	2021
Naval Service Vessel Mid-life Refit (Phase 1)	€4.0m	2020
Naval Service Vessel Mid-Life Refit (Phase 2)	€3.6m	2020
Dining Hall Refurbishment at Custume Barracks, Athlone	€4.1m	2019
Accommodation Upgrade at Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel	€3.3m	2020
Development of training facilities at Stephens Barracks, Kilkenny	€3.2m	2020
Accommodation Upgrade at Cathal Brugha Barracks, Dublin	€2.8m	2020
Fuel Storage Safety System, Haulbowline, Cork	€2.4m	2020
Accommodation Upgrade at Defence Forces Training Centre, Curragh Camp, Co Kildare	€2.0m	2020

Dublin-Monaghan Bombings

Ceisteanna (111)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Ceist:

111. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if he will consider reintroducing high level meetings between officials to address outstanding issues relating to the Dublin and Monaghan bombings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41890/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

17 May last marked the 45th anniversary of the appalling attacks of the Dublin and Monaghan bombings in which 33 people were murdered. The Minister for Justice and Equality, Charles Flanagan TD, represented the Government at the remembrance ceremony in Dublin.

The Government stands in solidarity with all those who lost loved ones or were injured on that day, and who suffer still as a result of these bombings.

The implementation of the All-Party Dáil motions relating to the Dublin and Monaghan bombings is a priority for the Government, as highlighted in the Programme for a Partnership Government. 

The All-Party motion on the 1974 Dublin Monaghan bombings adopted by the Dáil on 25 May 2016 has, like those adopted in 2008 and 2011, been conveyed to the British Government.

These motions call on the British Government to allow access by an independent, international judicial figure to all original documents relating to the Dublin and Monaghan bombings, as well as the Dublin bombings of 1972 and 1973, the bombing of Kay’s Tavern in Dundalk and the murder of Seamus Ludlow.

The Government is committed to actively pursuing the implementation of these all-Party Dáil motions. We have consistently raised the issue with the British Government on a bilateral basis, including at the British-Irish Inter-Governmental Conference on 8 May.

I and Minister Flanagan made clear to our counterparts at the Conference that the absence of a response from the British Government is of deep concern to the Government, and that there remains an urgent need for a response. 

The Government will continue to engage with the British Government on this request, at senior political level and in senior official level engagement by my Department, to pursue all possible avenues to achieve progress on this issue, consistent with the request made by this House and until a resolution is found.

I will be pleased to engage further with the Deputy and other Members of the House who are also active on this most important issue.

The Government will also maintain a close and cooperative relationship with Justice for the Forgotten, as we continue work to seek the full facts of the appalling events of 25 May 1974 and of other attacks in this jurisdiction during the Troubles.

Passport Applications

Ceisteanna (112)

Bríd Smith

Ceist:

112. Deputy Bríd Smith asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the reason a child (details supplied) has not had their application processed; the reason the child's father has been asked to supply additional documentation that is readily available to the authorities; and if the request for a passport requires additional documentation. [42190/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

All passport applications are subject to the provisions of the Passports Act, 2008 (“The 2008 Act”). The Act provides, among other things, that a person must be an Irish citizen before a passport can be issued to him/her. In order to meet this legal requirement, each person must demonstrate an entitlement to Irish citizenship in his/her passport application.

As part of the identity and citizenship verification process, the Passport Service requires applicants themselves, or the applicant’s guardian in the case of applications for children, to submit all necessary supporting documents in order to establish the applicant’s identity and entitlement to citizenship. It is not possible for the Passport Service to obtain these documents on an applicant’s behalf from other State or non-State bodies.

The applicant referred to was born in Ireland after 1 January 2005. Any possible claim to citizenship for the applicant is governed by the terms of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1956 as amended (“The 1956 Act”). Section 6A of the 1956 Act provides that a person born in the State on or after 1 January 2005, where neither parent is an Irish or British citizen or otherwise entitled to reside in the State or Northern Ireland without restriction at the time of that person’s birth, may claim citizenship by birth in the State (and thereby establish eligibility for an Irish passport) only where a parent has been lawfully resident in the State for three years of the four years preceding his/her birth.

In such cases, proofs of lawful residence in the State are required to determine if a parent has the required three year residence. The 2004 amendment of the 1956 Act makes particular provisions for nationals of EU Member States, who may make a declaration concerning their residence in the island of Ireland within the 4 years preceding their child’s birth. In such cases, the EU national is regarded as having resided on the island of Ireland for the declared periods for the purposes of the 1956 Act, unless the contrary is proved. These declarations must be supported by documentary evidence to verify residence in the State. For non-EU parents, permission to remain in the State recorded on passports, and/or registration cards, as issued by the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB), are acceptable proofs of a parent’s lawful residence in the context of a passport application.

In this case, proof of lawful residence in the State for either of the parents for the required time-period prior to the applicant's birth was not submitted in support of the passport application. In the absence of such proof of lawful residence, an entitlement to citizenship, and therefore eligibility for an Irish passport, was not established. I am advised by the Passport Service that letters were issued to the applicant’s father on 23 September and 30 September outlining what documents were required in order to establish this lawful residence.

If lawful residence in the State for the required time-period cannot be established, it may be open to the applicant in question to apply for Irish citizenship through naturalisation. A parent or guardian may lodge an application for naturalisation on behalf of a child if and when the conditions for naturalisation (including minimum residency terms) are satisfied. Citizenship, including naturalisation, comes under the remit of the Department of Justice and Equality. Further information on citizenship and naturalisation is available on the website of the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service.

Syrian Conflict

Ceisteanna (113, 118, 126)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

113. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on a planned Turkish invasion of northern Syria; his views on whether such an invasion by the Turkish military poses a threat to the Kurdish community and minority ethnic and religious groups in the region; his further views on whether such an invasion will also hamper the fight against Daesh-ISIS; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41742/19]

Niall Collins

Ceist:

118. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the US Administration’s decision to withdraw troops from northern Syria; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41749/19]

Ruth Coppinger

Ceist:

126. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the military action by Turkey in the Kurdish controlled part of Syria; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42285/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

I propose to take Questions Nos. 113, 118 and 126 together.

On 6 October, the US announced the withdrawal of US troops from north-east Syria, ahead of a Turkish offensive into Syrian territory. Turkey commenced military operations on 9 October, with the stated aim of preventing ‘the creation of a terror corridor’ along its border with Syria. These developments are deeply troubling. Turkey's military action has the potential to further destabilise a region which is still reeling from the fight against ISIS.

While we understand Turkey’s security concerns about its own territory, these concerns should be addressed through political and diplomatic means, in accordance with international humanitarian law. I am particularly concerned about the humanitarian impact of a military escalation and its potential to cause further displacement of civilian populations. In a statement on 9 October, I stressed that the protection of civilians and respect for international humanitarian law must be paramount.

I am also concerned about the long-term security implications of these developments. The fight against ISIS made decisive progress earlier this year. However, there remain individuals who have the potential to take advantage of any relaxation of vigilance Any unilateral military action against those groups which played a decisive frontline role in the fight against ISIS risks undermining this progress. It is also imperative that terrorist fighters remain securely detained, until their situation can be resolved, in order to prevent them joining the ranks of terrorist groups.

The position of the EU was made clear in a Declaration released on 9 October by the High Representative, reaffirming that a sustainable solution to the Syrian conflict cannot be achieved militarily, and calling upon Turkey to cease the unilateral action.

It is unlikely that the so-called ‘safe zone’ in north-east Syria, as envisaged by Turkey, would satisfy international criteria for refugee return as laid down by UNHCR. Ireland and the EU have maintained that returns of refugees and internally-displaced people to their places of origin must be voluntary, dignified and safe. The EU has been clear that any attempt at demographic change would be unacceptable. The EU will not provide stabilisation or development assistance in areas where the rights of local populations are ignored.

All military action in Syria risks undermining the work of the UN in attempting to facilitate a negotiated end to the conflict, and a political transition which meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. I take this opportunity to reiterate Ireland’s strong support for the work of the UN Special Envoy and urge all parties to engage with the UN-led process.

Foreign Conflicts

Ceisteanna (114)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

114. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the ongoing protests in Hong Kong and the escalating tensions and violence; if he has discussed the situation with his Chinese counterpart; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41743/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

I am concerned about the ongoing protests in Hong Kong, and in particular the escalation in the levels of violence in recent weeks. Ireland fully supports fundamental freedoms such as the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful demonstration. As I have noted previously in this House, Ireland has consistently called for these freedoms to be upheld, while encouraging all sides to refrain from violence, to exercise restraint, and to engage in an inclusive dialogue. In that regard, we welcome recent moves towards dialogue from Chief Executive Carrie Lam and the Hong Kong authorities.

I have not discussed the protests with my Chinese counterpart, as I have not had an opportunity to meet with him since the protests began in June. At a bilateral level, officials in my Department have engaged with the relevant Chinese authorities on the matter, including with representatives of the Hong Kong Government. Furthermore, the Consul General of Ireland in Hong Kong, and the Ambassador of Ireland to China, along with the EU Office, and representatives of other EU Member States in Hong Kong, have all been engaging regularly with Hong Kong authorities on this matter.

The EU, with the support of Ireland, has issued statements in response to developments in Hong Kong. The most recent statement was released on the 2 October by High Representative Mogherini on behalf of the EU. This statement recalled the EU’s support for the “one country, two systems” principle, and reiterated the EU position that restraint, de-escalation and dialogue are the only way forward. During the most recent session of the Human Rights Council on 10 September, the EU also expressed support for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights' call for the demonstrations to remain peaceful and for the respect of fundamental rights and freedoms, including the freedom of assembly.

The Consulate General of Ireland in Hong Kong, along with the Embassy of Ireland to China, and officials in my Department, continue to monitor the situation closely.

EU Issues

Ceisteanna (115)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

115. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his attention has been drawn to the questioning of the designate EU high representative and vice-president for foreign affairs and security policy Mr. Josep Borrell by the foreign affairs committee of the European Parliament; his views on his comments on the need to reinforce the military capacity of the EU and his desire to conduct overseas military missions by majority and to redivert the €10.5 billion European peace facility to pay for EU battlegroups to go into action; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41744/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

I look forward to working closely with Mr Borrell when he takes up duty on 1 November. His recent hearing covered a broad range of issues in varying levels of detail and, while interesting as indications of his thinking, can only be properly evaluated within the institutional context in which the EU and its Member States work.

The Treaty on the European Union stipulates that the Council adopts Common Foreign and Security Policy decisions by unanimity. While there are very limited circumstances in which Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) can be used, such as when appointing a Special Representative on the basis of a proposal by the High Representative/Vice President, the Treaty explicitly precludes decisions having military or defence implications from any such derogations. Under the Treaty therefore, EU military crisis management missions can only be approved by a unanimous decision of the Council.

With regard to the security-related aspects of Mr Borrell’s remarks, we understand them to refer in part to the European Defence Fund, but primarily to the proposed European Peace Facility, which remains under discussion at technical working group level in Brussels. Many aspects of the proposal remain unresolved in the technical discussions which are taking place in advance of any political decision on establishment of such a Facility. Such a decision is for the Council to make by unanimity.

One of the specific issues which has not been agreed among Member States is the proposal to expand the share of costs from military CSDP operations which would be funded in common, rather than directly by the troop contributing State. As to the overall level of spending envisaged, the outgoing High Representative/Vice President proposed that the European Peace Facility should have a budget of €10.5 billion over seven years. However, this budget would include all aspects of the proposed new European Peace Facility, including the incorporation into it of other existing EU initiatives which are currently funded through other mechanisms including, for instance, the African Peace Facility which funds important work by the African Union in preventing and resolving conflict on that continent. The proposed figure of €10.5 billion over seven years has not been agreed by Member States. Many Member States, including Ireland, would regard this figure as excessive.

Foreign Conflicts

Ceisteanna (116)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

116. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the Saudi-led coalition has illegally stopped all commercial ships, including those carrying food and fuel, from entering the Yemeni port of Alhodeidah (details supplied); and if he will raise this urgent issue with his Saudi counterpart. [41745/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

The ongoing crisis in Yemen remains extremely worrying. Ireland and the EU have been clear from the beginning that this situation can only be solved by political means, and that efforts to impose a military solution will be both fruitless and dangerous. We fully support the efforts of the UN Special Envoy for Yemen, Martin Griffiths, to bring about a political resolution, starting with the implementation of the December 2018 Stockholm Agreement, which was signed by the Government of Yemen and the Houthi de facto authorities.

After more than four years of conflict in this extremely poor country, almost 80% of the population of Yemen is in need of humanitarian assistance. Humanitarian access is a critical issue in a context where millions are unable to pay for food and medical care even when it is available, due to the collapse of the economy under the strains of conflict. Commercial access is also extremely important, since the Yemeni population cannot survive on aid alone. Bureaucratic impediments and delays to movements have unfortunately been common across Yemen, both in areas under Coalition or Government control, and areas controlled by the Houthis. It is imperative that the implementation of the Stockholm Agreement is progressed to ensure that humanitarian and commercial goods can enter Yemen freely.

The EU is the largest donor to the UN Verification and Inspection Mechanism (UNVIM). UNVIM was established in May 2016 to facilitate more efficient verification that imports of commercial goods at Yemen's ports do not contain arms. Following the Stockholm Agreement, UNVIM has also been assigned the role of supporting the Yemen Red Sea Ports Corporation in the management and inspection of ports. Ships are checked for arms and other contraband by UNVIM first in Djibouti and again at an arrival point 30km off the port of Hodeidah. The UNVIM operation is making an important contribution to ensuring the continued flow of commercial goods to Yemen.

I am aware of reports of a recent surge in the number of ships which are waiting to dock in Yemen, due to additional checks being undertaken by the Coalition after UNVIM checks. I understand that this delay in access is leading to a fuel crisis in Yemen which is exacerbating an already dire humanitarian situation. UNVIM was established at the request of the official Government of Yemen, and these additional checks are not acceptable given the importance of these goods to the people of Yemen.

I understand that UNSE Griffiths is currently working with all parties towards a solution which will bring the ships currently being held by the Coalition to dock in Hodeidah. Mr. Griffiths enjoys our full support in these efforts.

I have made my views on the importance of unrestricted humanitarian access and the free flow of commercial goods to Yemen absolutely clear to the Coalition parties. At my last meeting with the Saudi Ambassador I relayed Ireland’s concerns in this regard directly, and officials from my Department remain in regular contact with the Saudi and UAE embassies. Ireland does not have contact with the Houthis but my Department has made our concerns known to Iran, which has lines of communication with them.

Ireland takes every opportunity to press for a political solution to the crisis in Yemen, and for an end to violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, and for unfettered humanitarian and commercial access to Yemen. Since 2015, Ireland has provided over €21.5 million in humanitarian assistance to Yemen, including a contribution of €5 million this year. Ireland will continue to do what we can to assist the political and humanitarian effort in Yemen, through supporting the efforts of the UN, as well as advocating for an end to the conflict in our bilateral contacts.

Human Rights

Ceisteanna (117)

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

117. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on whether lack of compliance by Ireland with the European Convention on Human Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities due to the fact that a number of sections of the Mental Health Act 2001 do not meet the standards of either convention is damaging the international reputation of Ireland; his further views on whether this lack of compliance hinders Ireland's ability to speak with authority on respect for human rights and the European Convention on Human Rights; his further views on whether it is damaging to the campaign for election to the UN Security Council in 2020; and the steps he is taking to ensure Ireland is in compliance with international obligations. [41746/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

My Department acts as the Agent for the Government before the European Court of Human Rights. There are no outstanding judgments of the European Court of Human Rights finding the Mental Health Act 2001, or any section thereof, in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. Nor are there any pending communicated applications before the Court regarding the Mental Health Act 2001.

Ireland is due to submit  its initial report  under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in March 2020,  two years after we ratified the Treaty.  This document, together with shadow reports submitted by civil society, will form the basis for a review by the relevant Treaty Monitoring Body, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, on how the State is complying with its obligations under the Convention.

The promotion and protection of the human rights of all is fundamental to Ireland’s approach to the United Nations, informing our work on gender equality, sustainable development, humanitarian action and peace and security. In seeking election to the UN Security Council next year, Ireland is emphasising this strong tradition of engagement on human rights at the UN. Should we be successful at the election next year, this tradition will inform our actions as a member of the Security Council.

Question No. 118 answered with Question No. 113.

Middle East Issues

Ceisteanna (119)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

119. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if the nation state law that is being implemented in Israel has been discussed at the EU Foreign Affairs Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41750/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

I have previously expressed my concerns about the passing of the Nation State Law in Israel in the Dáil last year.

Much of the Law is declaratory in nature, and a year on it remains to be seen how much direct impact it will have in practice. However, even on a symbolic level, it risks marginalising Israeli citizens who are not Jewish, in particular the 20% of Israeli citizens who identify as Arab or Palestinian. It sends worrying signals about their status and their right to equality in the country which is their home. Some of these Israelis have expressed fears that the new law, which has the status of a Basic Law, may be a starting point for discrimination against minorities within Israel. There have been public demonstrations in Israel to express concerns about this Law, and concerns about the law have featured in debates during this year's Israeli election campaigns.

The Israeli Declaration of Independence stated that Israel will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex. For those Israelis whose first language is Arabic, the official status which that language has hitherto had is symbolically important of their status as equal citizens, as well as being important from a practical perspective.  This law sets out to privilege Jewish communities, and I know that many Israelis, both Arab and Jewish, have reacted with dismay to this.

A key point is that this new law states that "... the right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people". Nobody is denying the strong connection between the Jewish people and Israel. But Israel is also a home to many who are not Jewish, and this law sends a worrying signal about their rights as Israeli citizens, and the part they have to play in Israel’s democracy.  

I am also particularly concerned about the references to Jewish settlement. There have been different interpretations of whether this refers to Israel only, or also to the West Bank, but the ambiguity is very unhelpful in a volatile situation. The Government is wholly opposed to the construction of settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory. This language is also extremely worrying in the context of a number of pieces of legislation being proposed, and already passed, by the Knesset, which blur the lines between Israel and the West Bank.

The EU made its views on the Nation State Law known to Israel at the time, including the fact that this law could complicate the path to the two state solution. The law has not been specifically discussed at the EU Foreign Affairs Council. Last year my Department signaled our concerns about the Nation State Law to the Israeli Embassy in Dublin. We continue to monitor the situation closely through our Embassy in Tel Aviv and Representative Office in Ramallah. Israel is currently in the process of forming a Government and we will continue to follow the actions of the new government in this area.

Northern Ireland

Ceisteanna (120)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

120. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the status of efforts to restart the Executive in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41751/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

The continuing absence of the power-sharing Executive and Assembly in Northern Ireland and the North South Ministerial Council is of grave concern for the Government, as it is for the British Government.

I have engaged extensively with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland throughout the latest talks process, to encourage the parties to reach an accommodation. I remain in regular and ongoing contact with Secretary of State Smith, and I am meeting him this week, as we continue to work to seek an agreement between the parties to get all of the institutions of the Agreement up and running again.

All five political parties have engaged constructively in the talks process with that objective over the last number of months. Progress has been made across a range of important issues. However, some key outstanding issues remain and finding final agreement on these issues will require genuine and courageous dialogue and leadership by the party leaders in Northern Ireland.

The awful murder of Lyra McKee and the outpouring of public feeling that followed demands a serious response at political level. People want the devolved power-sharing institutions up and running again to represent their interests and deal with the issues and challenges that Northern Ireland faces at present, not least the issues raised by the UK exit from the European Union, however this proceeds.

The functioning of the North South Ministerial Council is also urgently required, to bring together the Executive and the Government to oversee and develop co-operation on the island, and as a vital part of the Good Friday Agreement.

In this context, the political parties, in particular the two largest parties, must live up to their responsibilities and be open to fair and workable compromises on the small number of outstanding issues, to secure the overall interests of people in Northern Ireland and to protect and operate the institutions of the Good Friday Agreement again.

This will be difficult, but the two Governments believe that this can, and must, be achieved.

Accordingly, the Government will continue to do everything possible to support continuing engagement and progress in discussions between the political parties, working with the UK Government in any scenario, as co-guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement.

Departmental Staff Data

Ceisteanna (121)

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

121. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the number of full-time and part-time civil servants his Department has recruited by grade in each of the years 2014 to 2018 and to date in 2019; the number of full-time and part-time civil servants his Department has lost due to retirement by grade in the same period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41819/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

In recent years my Department has recruited a significant number of additional staff. As well as  recruitment to fill vacancies that arose during the embargo, staff have been allocated to support brexit-related negotiations and preparations following the decision by the UK in 2016 to leave the EU. Further investment since then relates primarily to the enhancement of Ireland’s mission network as part of Global Ireland 2025, including operational and policy reinforcement in headquarters to support that objective.

In the past year new Embassies have opened in Wellington, Bogotá, Amman, Monrovia and Santiago de Chile, and new Consulates General in Vancouver, Mumbai, Cardiff, Frankfurt and Los Angeles. This brings to ninety the number of diplomatic Missions in the network. Next year new Embassy openings are planned for Kyiv, Manila and Rabat.

My Department has strengthened capacity in the Passport Service by recruiting additional permanent and temporary staff over the past twelve months to respond to a general increase in applications as well as from Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Full-time and part-time Civil Servants in my Department recruited between 1 January 2014 and 30 September 2019 are detailed by grade in the following table. 

2014
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	1
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	2
THIRD SECRETARY	25
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER	1
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	1
2015
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	1
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	3
SENIOR ARCHITECT	1
THIRD SECRETARY	11
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	3
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	3
CLERICAL OFFICER	23.6
SERVICES OFFICER	2
2016
PRINCIPAL OFFICER	1
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	4
ASSISTANT LEGAL ADVISOR	2
FIRST SECRETARY	3
PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT GR 1	1
THIRD SECRETARY	30
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	4
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	13
CLERICAL OFFICER	53
SERVICES OFFICER	4
2017
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	1
ASSISTANT LEGAL ADVISOR	1
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	6
FIRST SECRETARY	17
PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT GR 1	1
THIRD SECRETARY	21
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER	1
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	27
CLERICAL OFFICER	63
2018
COUNSELLOR	2
PRINCIPAL OFFICER	1
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	5
FIRST SECRETARY	7
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	3
ARCHITECT	2
THIRD SECRETARY	37
ARCHIVIST	1
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	11
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	22
CLERICAL OFFICER	93
SERVICES OFFICER	3
SERVICES ATTENDANT	1
2019 to date
PRINCIPAL OFFICER	1.7
PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT	3
FIRST SECRETARY	14
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	6
ASSISTANT LEGAL ADVISOR	2
THIRD SECRETARY	52
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER	1
ARCHIVIST GRADE III	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	9
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	19
ICT APPRENTICE	1
CLERICAL OFFICER	145
SERVICES OFFICER	2

Full-time and part-time Civil Servants in my Department that have retired between 1 January 2014 and 30 September 2019 are detailed by grade in the following table.

2014
SECRETARY GENERAL	1
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	4
COUNSELLOR	5
PRINCIPAL OFFICER	3
SENIOR DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	1
PROFESSIONAL OFFICER GRADE III	1
STAFF OFFICER	1
CLERICAL OFFICER	5.3
2015
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	5
COUNSELLOR HIGHER	7
PRINCIPAL DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	1
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	3
FIRST SECRETARY	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	3
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	0.6
STAFF OFFICER	2
CLERICAL OFFICER	8.7
2016
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	4
COUNSELLOR	2
FIRST SECRETARY	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	1.8
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	1.5
STAFF OFFICER	1
CLERICAL OFFICER	6
NIGHTWATCHMAN	1
CLEANER	1
2017
SECRETARY GENERAL	1
DEPUTY SECRETARY	1
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	4
SENIOR DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	1
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	2
FIRST SECRETARY	1
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST	0.8
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	3
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	2
CLERICAL OFFICER	21.2
SERVICES OFFICER	1
2018
DEPUTY SECRETARY	1
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	1
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	1
FIRST SECRETARY	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	2
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	2.6
CLERICAL OFFICER	9.3
2019 to date
SECRETARY GENERAL	2
ASSISTANT SECRETARY	1
COUNSELLOR	1
ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL	2
FIRST SECRETARY	1
HIGHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER	6.5
EXECUTIVE OFFICER	0.8
CLERICAL OFFICER	6.6
SERVICES OFFICER	1
CLEANER	1

The tables include staff recruited to fill vacancies or newly approved posts. 

The lists do not include political staff such as Special Advisers or Temporary Clerical Officers (TCOs) who are engaged annually on fixed- term contracts primarily to assist the Passport Service during the annual peak demand period.

The tables do not include temporary Third Secretaries, officers transferred in on a ‘head-to-head’ basis, or on mobility.

Human Rights Cases

Ceisteanna (122)

Tony McLoughlin

Ceist:

122. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the efforts being made to highlight at EU level the imprisonment of former Bangladeshi Prime Minister, Begum Khaleda Zia, and the need for international assistance to return democracy to Bangladesh; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42044/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

The EU is fully aware of the case of former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia and is monitoring the process of appeals closely. After the general elections in Bangladesh in December 2018, the EU noted that there was strong mobilisation of voters and participation of the opposition in the elections, but stated that the national authorities should properly examine allegations of irregularities and commit to transparency in their resolution. 

In June of this year, Eamon Gilmore, in his capacity as EU Special Representative for Human Rights, visited Bangladesh and engaged with representatives about the need for the Government of Bangladesh to address issues including inclusiveness of the political process, the rule of law, and space for civil society. 

The EU is currently in the process of funding projects in Bangladesh that work to strengthen and promote democracy through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights. In addition, the EU has raised human rights issues and respect for the rule of law with the Government of Bangladesh within the framework of the EU-Bangladesh Joint Commission. 

The Embassy of Ireland in New Delhi (which is accredited to Bangladesh), in close partnership with the EU Delegation to Bangladesh, will continue to monitor the political situation.

Syrian Conflict

Ceisteanna (123)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

123. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if his attention has been drawn to reports that authorities in Lebanon are forcefully returning Syrians to Syria; the steps that have been taken at EU level regarding the issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42149/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

The conflict in Syria has caused over 5.6 million people to flee Syria since 2011, the majority to neighbouring countries in the region. The Syria crisis has persisted for eight and a half years, and refugees have had to remain in neighbouring countries far longer than expected. Lebanon has welcomed a particularly large number of refugees from Syria, reportedly up to 1.5 million people. This number is equivalent to a third of the country’s population, and is the highest concentration per capita of refugees in the world. This has placed a huge strain on Lebanon’s resources and public services, making daily life a struggle for many refugees and indeed for host communities also.

Following rising concerns in Lebanon over the provision of public services, and with the Lebanese economy under severe pressure, there has been a growing wish in Lebanon that Syrian refugees would be in a position to return home. In May 2019 Lebanese authorities announced a decision to deport all Syrians who entered Lebanon irregularly after 24 April. I understand that Lebanon has already deported over 2,700 refugees to Syria under this decision.

The EU recognises the right to safe, voluntary and dignified returns, as an individual right of refugees and internally displaced persons, and returns should be based on an accurate picture of the conditions in the cuontry of origin. Refugee returns require a sustainable and safe environment, rehabilitation and the restoration of national protection structures. Ireland shares the position of the European Union and UNHCR, that the conditions for safe and dignified returns are not currently met in Syria. Nor is it possible to monitor the reintegration of Syrian refugees back into their country of origin, to ensure their continued safety.

Ireland continues to show solidarity with refugee hosting countries, and has been a committed donor to the humanitarian needs of affected populations. This year, Ireland provided just over €6m in direct assistance to UN agencies and NGOs operating in Lebanon. Our partners undertake programmes to provide basic assistance needs, as well as to provide resilience and livelihood opportunities for people living in protracted displacement. A further €2.95m of funding earmarked by Ireland to the World Food Programme (WFP) for the Syria Region in 2019, has been disbursed in Lebanon.

Syrian Conflict

Ceisteanna (124)

Niall Collins

Ceist:

124. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the safeguards that have been put in place by the EU to assist persons forced to flee Syria to neighbouring countries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42150/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

The Syrian conflict has created one of the worst humanitarian crises of our time, causing more than 5.6 million people to flee their country. Neighbouring countries who have been hosting millions of refugees, particularly Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, are under immense strain as services and resources are stretched to breaking point. The military action by Turkey in north-east Syria which began on 9 October risks exacerbating the situation with further displacements.  

The EU is a key actor in responding to the Syrian crisis, and works with governments, the UN and with civil society across the region to provide support for refugees and host communities. The EU hosted the third conference on "Supporting the Future of Syria and the Region" in March 2019. The Conference renewed the political, humanitarian and financial commitment of the international community to support the Syrian people, and the neighbouring countries most affected by the conflict.  Pledges by participants amounted to €6.2 billion for 2019, and multi-year pledges of close to €2.1 billion. Ireland pledged €25 million at the Conference, bringing our total funding for the Syria crisis to over €143 million since 2012 – our largest ever response to any single crisis. 

In total, the EU and its Member States have mobilised almost €17 billion since 2012 for humanitarian, stabilisation and resilience assistance to support Syrians inside the country and in Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Turkey and Egypt. This figure includes a 2019 pledge of €2.57 billion from the EU Budget.

EU support is channelled through a range of partners including UN agencies, the International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, the World Food Programme, local and international NGOs, as well as EU Trust Funds. The EU’s partners provide those in need with humanitarian supplies and access to urgently-needed health, education, water, and sanitation services, as well as cash-based assistance for Syrians affected by the crisis. 

Since its establishment in December 2014, a significant share of the EU’s support to help Syrian refugees has been provided through the EU Regional Trust Fund in Response to the Syrian Crisis, which is focussed on an integrated EU aid response to address longer-term resilience for Syrian refugees, as well as easing pressure on host communities and their administrations. The EU also funds the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRIT), which aims to meet the immediate humanitarian needs of Syrian refugees in Turkey and to bring about long-term sustainable improvements in their health, education and self-reliance.  

Ireland and the EU have been clear in our support for those Syrian refugees who wish to return to their homes. However, we believe that any returns must be voluntary, dignified and safe, and based on an accurate picture of the conditions at home. 

I discussed the situation in Syria with my EU colleagues at the Foreign Affairs Council yesterday. We condemned Turkey’s military action, which seriously undermines the stability and the security of the whole region, and urged Turkey to cease its unilateral military action in North East Syria and to withdraw its forces. Member States also unanimously agreed that they would suspend arms exports to Turkey.  

The EU remains committed to the unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria. This can be assured only through a genuine political transition in line with UNSCR 2254 and the 2012 Geneva Communique, negotiated by the Syrian parties within the UN-led Geneva process. Ireland will continue to work with the EU to respond to recent developments in north-east Syria, to contribute to the humanitarian effort, and to support the UN-led peace process.

Human Rights

Ceisteanna (125)

Frank O'Rourke

Ceist:

125. Deputy Frank O'Rourke asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade his views on the position of Ireland on the ongoing political crisis and human rights violations in Bahrain; if he will consider introducing a joint statement at the Human Rights Council in Geneva condemning the ongoing abuse of human rights in Bahrain and demanding the release of political prisoners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42166/19]

Freagraí scríofa

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

The human rights situation in Bahrain remains a matter of concern. Although Bahrain has repeatedly stated its commitment to improving its human rights record and safeguarding human rights as enshrined in the Bahraini Constitution, there are ongoing instances of violations of fundamental freedoms there, including violations of freedom of opinion and expression, as well as the targeting of human rights defenders. Ireland attaches a high priority to safeguarding human rights defenders, and continually advocates for freedom for civil society actors to operate in a safe and enabling environment, without repression. 

I was alarmed to learn of the executions of three people in July, including two human rights activists. A moratorium on the death penalty had been in place in Bahrain since 2010, and we saw the resumption of capital punishment in Bahrain in 2017 as a very negative development. Ireland condemns the use of the death penalty in all circumstances. Along with our EU partners, Ireland calls on Bahrain to again introduce a moratorium on executions, as a step towards the abolition of the death penalty.

I am also aware of reports of inhumane detention conditions as well as allegations that political prisoners in Bahrain have been tortured. I understand that a large number of prisoners held in Jau Prison in Bahrain went on hunger strike in response to these conditions. Ireland urges all States to safeguard the human rights of prisoners and detainees and is committed to the prevention and eradication of torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Respect for human rights is an integral part of Ireland’s foreign policy and we consistently seek to raise our concerns on human rights issues through the most appropriate and effective channels. Our active participation at the UN Human Rights Council is particularly important in that regard. Ireland regularly raises the case of human rights in Bahrain at that forum, in the form of national statements and its support to EU Statements. For example, in September 2018, Ireland expressed concerns about the ongoing restrictions on civil society space and the treatment of human rights defenders, and called on Bahrain to respect freedom of opinion and expression. In February 2019, Ireland reiterated concern at the ongoing detention of human rights defenders. In our Item 4 statement at the Human Rights Council in July 2019, Ireland called on Bahrain to ensure respect for freedom of opinion and expression, and the right to a fair trial.

Ireland also took the opportunity at the most recent Council in September 2019 to reiterate its opposition to the use of the death penalty in all circumstances. Since 2012, Ireland has signed five Human Rights Council joint statements on the human rights situation in Bahrain, which expressed concern on a number of fronts including the mistreatment of detainees, repression of demonstrations, and the arbitrary deprivation of nationality without due process. We shall consider carefully any opportunity to participate in a joint statement at a future Human Rights Council session, and I have asked my officials to keep the matter under review.

Our principled stance on human rights also feeds into our bilateral dialogue and we raise our human rights concerns directly with the Bahraini authorities at every opportunity. When I met the Bahraini Foreign Minister in New York last month I made a point of raising the human rights situation directly with him, expressing the hope that we can have an open and honest discussion on these issues. In addition, officials from my Department meet regularly with advocacy groups and Bahraini human rights defenders to discuss the situation in Bahrain.

Ireland will continue to monitor developments in Bahrain, and to call on the Bahraini Government to deliver on its stated commitment to make progress in relation to human rights. We shall do so both directly with Bahraini officials, as well as at EU and international level, including at the Human Rights Council, whenever opportunities arise.

Question No. 126 answered with Question No. 113.