Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Forestry Sector

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 26 January 2022

Wednesday, 26 January 2022

Ceisteanna (217)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

217. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if the University College of Dublin attitudes to forestry survey focused on counties Wicklow and Kerry conducted by a person (details supplied) will feed into Project Woodland and the current forestry review process; his views on a statement by the person encouraging the public to respond to the survey; the average value of one hectare of sitka spruce across all yield classes and for each yield class; if he will provide the most up-to-date cost benefit analysis for public spending on forestry; if this includes current forestry issues relating to water quality; and if damage to water by current forestry practices is being taken into account in cost benefit analysis for public funding. [3738/22]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am aware of and appreciate the valuable research conducted by Dr Augustenburg in relation to forestry.

Forestry Survey

A national, shared vision for the future of Ireland's trees and forests and a new Forestry Strategy are currently being developed as part of the work carried out in Project Woodland. This new Forest Strategy will underpin a new Forestry Programme for the period 2023 - 2027. An extensive public consultation process on the new strategy has commenced.

Third level institutions, such as UCD, are of course important stakeholders in this process and I would particularly like to encourage them to participate in the different stages of engagement.

My Department has developed a Felling Decision Tool to provide owners with information on estimated timber revenues at different stages in the forest cycle. This tool may be used to assist in deciding when to clearfell, by providing financial information on the implication of felling earlier or later than when the financial returns are normally at their highest.

Using the Felling Decision Tool, it is possible to assess how clearfell revenue varies according to yield class. The assumptions made for each yield class scenario presented below remained constant across the range. It was assumed that each stand was thinned three times prior to clearfell, the stand was clearfelled when it reached a tree size of 0.7 cubic metres and the timber price used was based on a five year average (i.e. 2015-2019).

Yield Class

Clearfell Age

Net Clearfell volume (m3/ha)

Net Clearfell Revenue (€/ha)

12

54

466

€26,305

14

47

427

€24,006

16

43

413

€23,361

18

39

394

€22,150

20

36

367

€20,673

22

35

357

€20,206

24

32

310

€17,391

26

31

312

€17,523

28

29

282

€15,893

Average Net Clear fell (€/ha)

€20,834

The Felling Decision Tool is freely available on the Department’s website for users to explore the impact of management and fell age on clearfell revenue for a range of species.

The most recent cost-benefit analysis is contained in the policy document ‘Forests, products and people, Irelands forest policy – a renewed vision (2014) and can be accessed at: www.gov.ie/en/publication/d3bc0-forests-products-and-people-irelands-forest-policy-a-renewed-vision/ (also attached). Section 2.5.4 of the cost benefit analysis provides details regarding forestry and water quality.

It is expected that a Cost Benefit Analysis will be carried out for a range of measures in the context of the development of the next Forestry Programme.

Barr
Roinn